DOJ Wants Online Gambling Lawsuit Thrown Out
The Department of Justice does not want to scrap the xv states suing them over their attack on cyberspace betting. So they’ve made a proactive move to try to avoid having to defend their actions inwards court… and to hold states under their thumb. Links to gambling news stories, games reviews and special offers below.
⭐️ This Week’s Special Offer from bet365: http://online.casinocity.com/sportsbooks/bet365-sportsbook-and-racebook/
? Video Review for Turn Your Fortune: https://youtu.be/CVjC3EIoE30
⚫️ DOJ Wants Lawsuit Tossed: https://www.thisweekingambling.com/justice-department-wire-act-lawsuit-tossed/
⚫️ 5th State Regulates Online Gambling: https://www.thisweekingambling.com/5th-state-regulates-west-virginia-online-gambling-becomes-law/
? Gambling News on Our Website: http://www.thisweekingambling.com/
? Subscribe on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=thisweekingambling
? similar us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ThisWeekInGambling/
? Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/twigfeed
✴️ DoJ files motion to dismiss NH Wire Act challenge ✴️
—————————————————————————————-
The DOJ argues that just one clause of the linguistic communication inwards question, which bans the interstate transmission of “info assisting inwards the placing of bets or wagers on any sporting case or contest”, applies to sports betting.
The others, it says, deliberately do not refer to “sporting events or contests” as they were designed to apply to all forms of gambling. It also notes that changes from before drafts of the legislation suggest that while it may have got originally been designed to cover sports betting only, it was later expanded.
Furthermore, the DOJ argues that the concerns set out by the New Hampshire Lottery inwards its filing inwards February, relating to its first of all Amendment rights being infringed upon, are unfounded. The lottery argued that lawful, non-misleading info helpful inwards the placement of bets or wagers, such as advertisements, could be affected by the new Wire Act opinion.
nevertheless the DOJ denies this. Instead it states the clause inwards question – which bans “wire communication which entitles the recipient to receive money or credit . . . for info assisting inwards the placing of bets or wagers” – does not constitute a blanket prohibition on the interstate transmission of gambling-related info.
It also denies that the new Wire Act opinion infringes on state rights (the Tenth Amendment), arguing that it becomes a matter for the federal regime as it concerns interstate matters. Despite this, the DOJ argues that should the court rule inwards favor of the plaintiff, it should not number nationwide relief to all states, which would effectively allow them to disregard the Wire Act opinion.
As such, it requests the court grant the motion to dismiss, deny the plaintiffs’ motions for summary judgement and terminate the cases.
#GamblingNews #DOJ #OnlineGambling